One of the tree lined streets in UP on holy noons going to the library. |
Here are some of the most celebrated, at least to me, annotated bibliographies that I managed to write:
Rorty, A.
O. (1998). Philosophers on education: New
historical perspectives. London: Routledge
The
implicit paradigm of Freud to learning was the way children conducted “sexual
researchers.” Children should discover sex in their own ways based on their own
needs at particular stage. He further illustrated a war between curiosity and
education. Children want to know sex but adults tell them to learn education to
distract them. Hence, education teaches the child to get disinterest in what
really matters most to learn – sex.
Edgerton,
S. H. (1996). Translating the curriculum.
New York: Routledge
This selfish
love is the one where the lover soaks as much experience into the self from the
other who is loved though not in intrusive and obliterating way. It is
different from selfless love which involves emotional investment that includes
risk of rejection at the same time. But in order for love to grow, it should be
selfish that it cannot risk to be rejected... it must require reciprocity and
the lover must get in return of that investment. This deconstruction of
hierarchy of love is found in the transference love – a love that is peculiar
to pedagogical situation. This love here does not function as analogy for
teaching and learning; it is real and important condition for pedagogy.
Orata, P.
R. (19780. Self help barangay high
schools. Quezon City: New Day Publsihers
If Mohammad
cannot go to the mountain, then the mountain should go to Mohammad. If the
children cannot go to the schools, then the schools should go to the children.
We desire the same philosophy in our educational system today. We should stop looking
at the other side of the fence, the educational systems of other countries; the
grass is always greener in our own backyard, the unnoticed margins of our
education history.
Ballenger,
B. (2007). The curious researcher: A
guide to writing research papers. New York: Pearson Custom Publishing
Tourists
still buy bags of seeds for about a dollar and pose for pictures drenched in
appealing flocks of pigeons. On the other side, officials of these cities
continue to wage war they call “pest control” against these birds that decay
cultural monuments and drop dung fungus. It is hard not to admire the traits of
these pigeons, but it is also undesirable for these creatures to earn a
negative label when it is only a normal part of their pigeon existence. Some wars
we encounter today, either personal or social, are some wars that we cannot win
because humans just know that the rewards of winning will not be worth the
cost. Like the pigeon battle, our wars are futile endeavors that we cannot win
because we also battle our own conflicts: our political responsibility to
protect the great works of humanity and at the same time our moral obligation
to share space with other lives in this planet.
Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum planning. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace, Inc.
Knowing has always focused on the objective study - dispassionate and detached. This objectivity fails to create harmony of relative realities, which in turn produces a crippling isolation of dream and reality, ambiguity and certainty, thought and action, poetry and science. This is the concern of the feminist movement in curriculum. The modes of thought and action experienced by women are process rather than product, social rather than isolated, facilitating rather than competitive, intuitive rather than rigid, supportive rather than difficult. What the feminist pedagogy offers is not simply a curriculum that responds more fairly to the needs of women, but a curriculum that reflects fully the nature of humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Has this article been interesting, informative or inspiring? I want to know what's going on your side. Please leave your comments. Thank you.